The field of social psychology has long been fascinated by the intricacies of group dynamics, exploring how individuals behave within groups and how these behaviors shape collective outcomes. This paper delves into the interplay between social psychology and group dynamics, examining key theories and empirical findings that elucidate the complexities of group interactions. It begins by outlining the fundamental concepts of social psychology, including conformity, social influence, and groupthink, which are pivotal in understanding the psychological processes that govern group behavior. Subsequently, the paper focuses on the dynamics of group formation, emphasizing the roles of leadership, cohesion, and teamwork. Furthermore, it investigates the factors that contribute to group effectiveness and the emergence of group norms. The study concludes by discussing the implications of understanding group dynamics for organizational behavior, leadership development, and social change initiatives, highlighting the importance of applying social psychological principles to enhance group performance and foster positive group interactions.
Harris, M. (2022). Social Psychology and Group Dynamics. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 4(1), 38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
ACS Style
Harris, M. Social Psychology and Group Dynamics. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 4, 38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
AMA Style
Harris M. Social Psychology and Group Dynamics. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences; 2022, 4(1):38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, Michael 2022. "Social Psychology and Group Dynamics" Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences 4, no.1:38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Harris, M. Social Psychology and Group Dynamics. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 4, 38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
AMA Style
Harris M. Social Psychology and Group Dynamics. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences; 2022, 4(1):38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, Michael 2022. "Social Psychology and Group Dynamics" Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences 4, no.1:38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
APA style
Harris, M. (2022). Social Psychology and Group Dynamics. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 4(1), 38. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20230422
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1-70.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavior in laboratory groups: An experimental analysis of authority. In H. Guetzkow (ed.), Groups, leadership, and communication (pp. 371-406). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Group & Organization Studies, 1(1), 38-47.
Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leadership: The practice of political leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Crook, T. L., & Steiner, I. D. (2005). The role of group cohesion in the performance of sports teams: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27(4), 425-453.
Thompson, L. L. (1967). Effective teamwork: More than the sum of the parts. California Management Review, 10(1), 77-92.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 71(1), 111-119.
Nembhard, I. M., & Thompson, L. L. (2002). Diversity in teams and groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 419-442.
Burt, R. S. (2004). The structure of social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 345-370.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams: How to create a powerful team in just days. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (1999). Ethical leadership: Current issues and the research agenda. Ethics & Behavior, 9(4), 327-352.
