Journal Browser
Open Access Journal Article

Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights

by John Harris 1,*
1
John Harris
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 24 February 2022 / Accepted: 1 March 2022 / Published Online: 13 March 2022

Abstract

The title "Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights" encapsulates the exploration of the conceptual underpinnings that have shaped the theory and practice of human rights. This paper delves into the historical and philosophical discourse surrounding human rights, focusing on key figures and ideas that have contributed to the conception and evolution of human rights norms. It analyzes the philosophical frameworks, such as natural law, social contract theory, and existentialism, that have influenced the development of human rights discourse. The interplay between these philosophical traditions and their implications for contemporary human rights law and policy is examined. The paper argues that the philosophical foundations are crucial in understanding the universal nature of human rights and their application across different cultural and societal contexts. It concludes with a reflection on the potential challenges and future directions for the philosophical examination of human rights.


Copyright: © 2022 by Harris. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Harris, J. (2022). Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 4(1), 27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313
ACS Style
Harris, J. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 4, 27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313
AMA Style
Harris J. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences; 2022, 4(1):27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, John 2022. "Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights" Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences 4, no.1:27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Harris, J. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2022, 4, 27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313
AMA Style
Harris J. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences; 2022, 4(1):27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, John 2022. "Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights" Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences 4, no.1:27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313
APA style
Harris, J. (2022). Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Frontiers of Humanities & Social Sciences, 4(1), 27. doi:10.69610/j.fhss.20220313

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Locke, J. (1690). Second Treatise of Government.
  3. Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). The Social Contract.
  4. Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
  5. Sartre, J.-P. (1944). Being and Nothingness.
  6. Aquinas, T. (1274). Summa Theologica.
  7. George, R. P. (1999). The Clash of Orthodoxies: Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis.
  8. Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach.
  9. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity.
  10. Beccaria, C. (1776). On Crimes and Punishments.
  11. Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation.
  12. Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism.
  13. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice.
  14. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's Empire.
  15. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom.